Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 414 So. 2d 939 - Ex Parte Scott

414 So. 2d 939 - Ex Parte Scott’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2018

17 state decisions

601982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Salter v. Upjohn Co. · Assured Inv'rs Life Ins. Co. v. Nat. U. Assoc. · Ex Parte Huguley Water System · Ex Parte Rice · Smith v. Flynn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[T]he party who seeks a protective order has the burden of showing good cause why discovery should not be had. "`Thus, to be entitled to a protective order, a movant must either show good cause why the objected-to deposition or production of documents would be unduly burdensome or expensive, oppressive, embarrassing or annoying, or that the subject matter sought to be discovered is privileged.'"”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"There are no assertions in the motions for a protective order that would amount to a showing of good cause. ... We do not think these assertions indicate annoyance, embarrassment or oppression or show undue burden or expense as required by Rule 26(c), A[la]. R. C[iv]. P. Hence, to grant a protective order on the grounds asserted by the defendants is an abuse of discretion."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"Here, not only has there been a denial of the taking of a deposition, but the denial of discovery altogether or at least a total postponement. There may be instances where the complete denial of discovery is justified, but based on the record before us, this is not such a case."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.