Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 414 U.S. 141 - Cupp v. Naughten

Cupp v. Naughten’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

5,229
cited by 5,229 later decisions
106
cited 106 times by the Supreme Court
46
states following
June 2026
most recently cited

2,211 federal appellate · 274 district · 738 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5,229 later decisions (106 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2026 · most notably Thomas v. Arn (1986), Estelle v. McGuire (1991)

2,211 federal appellate · 274 district · 738 state decisions — followed in 46 states

1.8k0197319801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedNaughten v. Cupp (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Harrington v. California · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Cited together with Henderson v. Kibbe · Sandstrom v. Montana · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Wainwright v. Sykes · Chapman v. State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5,229 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “so infected the entire trial that the resulting conviction violates due process.”
    292 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[e]very witness is presumed to speak the truth,”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`in artificial isolation, but ... in the context of the overall charge.'”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.