Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 414 U.S. 417 - Marshall v. United States

Marshall v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

485
cited by 485 later decisions
25
cited 25 times by the Supreme Court
23
states following
June 2026
most recently cited

175 federal appellate · 38 district · 149 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 485 later decisions (25 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2026 · most notably Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia (1976), Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas (1974)

175 federal appellate · 38 district · 149 state decisions — followed in 23 states

1780197419801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedMarshall v. Parker (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Dandridge v. Williams · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · McGowan v. State of Maryland Gallagher · Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · Bolling v. Sharpe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 485 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen Congress undertakes to act in areas fraught with medical and scientific uncertainties, legislative options must be especially broad and courts should be cautious not to rewrite legislation, even assuming, arguendo, that judges with more direct exposure to the problem might make wiser choices.”
    18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “legislative classifications need not be perfect or ideal.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “an offender who has been convicted of a felony on two or more prior occasions.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.