Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 414 U.S. 524 - O'Brien v. Skinner

O'Brien v. Skinner’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

273
cited by 273 later decisions
37
cited 37 times by the Supreme Court
12
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

68 federal appellate · 24 district · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 273 later decisions (37 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2021 · most notably Bell v. Wolfish (1979), Missouri v. Hunter (1983)

68 federal appellate · 24 district · 35 state decisions — followed in 12 states

900197419801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · Dunn v. Blumstein · Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15 · McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of Chicago · Cipriano v. City of Houma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 273 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is not our function to construe a state statute contrary to the construction given it by the highest court of a State.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““More recently in Goosby v. Osser, 409 U.S. 512 (1973), the Court again considered the problem of inmate voting and concluded that, unlike the voting restrictions in the McDonald case, the statute there in question was an absolute bar to voting because of a specific provision that ‘persons confined in a penal institution’ were not permitted to vote by absentee ballot. It is clear, therefore, that the appellants here, like the petitioners in Goosby, bring themselves within the precise fact structure that the McDonald holding foreshadowed”: 414 U.S. at 529, 530 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “sitting side by side in the same cell may receive different treatment as to voting rights”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.