In Re RH’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2001
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re J. M. · In Re JM · In Re Lee · In Re RB · In Re PF
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(A) Has been abandoned or abused by his parents, guardian or other custodian; or (B) Is without proper parental care or subsistence, education, medical, or other care necessary for his well-being; or (C) Is without or beyond the control of his parents, guardian or other custodian ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re B.B.“[w]ithout adequate findings this Court cannot determine if the facts support the judgment in the particulars alleged in the petition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re MCP
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.