Baud v. Carroll’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 1329 · 11 U.S.C. § 707 · 28 U.S.C. § 157 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Robinson v. Shell Oil Co. · Lamie v. United States Trustee · In Re Hardacre · In Re Alexander
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(4) For purposes of this subsection, the “applicable commitment period”— (A) subject to paragraph (B), shall be— (i) 3 years; or (ii) not less than 5 years, if the current monthly income of the debtor and the debtor’s spouse combined, when multiplied by 12, is not less than— [the applicable median income] (B) may be less than 3 or 5 years, whichever is applicable under subparagraph (A), but only if the plan provides for payment in full of all allowed unsecured claims over a shorter period.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Baud v. Carroll“'directly and adversely affected pecuniarily by the order.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Baud v. Carroll
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.