Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

415 F.2d 1005

Docket No. 26836 Summary Calendar.

Johnson v. Heyd

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1969-08-27

2 counsel of record

Relies on Johnson v. Heyd

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1969-08-27

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2006

4 federal appellate ·

4019691970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Earl J. Amedee, A. M. Trudeau, Jr., New Orleans, La., for appellant.

John B. Hattier, Bernard A. Horton, New Orleans, La., for appellee.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

This Court having, on July 16, 1969, 413 F.2d 1040, vacated the judgment and remanded the above-named cause to the District Court with instructions to make findings of fact as provided in Rule 52 (a) and required by Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and

¶2

It now being made to appear to this Court that such findings were made by the District Court on October 9, 1968, after notice of appeal to this Court was filed by appellant on July 29, 1968, the order of this Court remanding the cause to the District Court is hereby vacated.

¶3

After a perusal of all the evidence in the record, we conclude that the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law of the trial Judge were correct, and the appellant's assertions of error are without merit.

¶4

The judgment is affirmed.

/415/f2d/1005 · .json · Public domain