Davis v. Sigler’s Empirical Analysis
415 F.2d 1159 · 1969
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Bruton v. United States · Jackson v. Denno · Pointer v. Texas · Douglas v. Alabama · Delli Paoli v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This court has recognized this distinction arid has held that the Bruton principle must be applied on a case-to-case basis ‘with practicality and common sense.’ (Citing cases.) We apply this standard to the evidence received in the joint trial.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.