Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 415 F.2d 1365 - Stamler v. Willis

Stamler v. Willis’s Empirical Analysis

415 F.2d 1365 · 1969

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
September 2007
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2007 · most notably Eastland v. United States Servicemen's Fund (1975), United States v. Dellinger (1972)

21 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

28019691970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Powell v. McCormack · Dombrowski v. Pfister · Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer · Golden v. Zwickler · United States v. Radio Television News Directors Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(t)he judiciary has always borne the basic responsibility for protecting individuals against unconstitutional invasions of their rights by all branches of the Government.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"The Government has taken the opportunity of this appeal to reargue questions of standing, jurisdiction, justiciability, venue, separation of powers, want of equity, and substantiality of the federal questions presented by the complaints. Such contentions have been considered and decided adversely to the Government in Stamler v. Willis , 371 F.2d 413 (7th Cir. 1966), and in the unanimous November 8, 1967, denial of the Government's motion to dismiss and need not be reconsidered here. On remand the parties should develop the necessary factual predicate and direct their legal arguments to the substantive questions . . . raised in the original complaints."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The Senators and ’ Representatives * * * for any Speech or Debate in either House * * * shall not be questioned in any other Place.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.