Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 415 F.2d 259 - Hartz v. United States

Hartz v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

415 F.2d 259 · 1969

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
3
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently January 2012 · most notably Elaine Jones v. Griffith (1973), Felder v. United States (1976)

22 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

200196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States of America and Baker Aircraft Sales v. Betty K. Furumizo, Betty K. Furumizo v. United States of America and Baker Aircraft Sales · Joyce O'connor, as Administratrix of the Estate of Benedict O'connor, Deceased v. United States · Har-Pen Truck Lines, Inc. v. Mills · Hartz v. United States · United States v. Edward C. Becker, Administrator of the Estate of Ernest J. Becker, Deceased

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It has been frequently thought that in the ordinary jury-tried personal injury suit, it would introduce too many complicating factors to permit the ordinary defendant to seek a reduction of the potential claim against him .by giving consideration to the matter of income taxes that would have been paid by the decedent. This is understandable and we find no fault with the decisions that in personal injury actions between private parties no consideration need be given to the incidence of taxation,” 415 F.2d at 264-265 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.