Gairson v. Cupp’s Empirical Analysis
415 F.2d 352 · 1969
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently September 1996 · most notably United States v. Mouzin (1986), Lozada v. Deeds (1992)
24 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Douglas v. People of State of California · Rodriquez v. United States · Entsminger v. Iowa
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]ere we to hold that the constitutionally protected right to the assistance of effective trial counsel ended at the moment sentence was pronounced, we would leave many criminal defendants suspended between counsel with the result that direct appeal, otherwise available, would be lost and the time consuming process of postconviction proceedings would be begun.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cahill v. Rushen · Smith v. State“The failure of appellant's trial counsel to preserve his client's statutory right to appeal resulted in a deprivation of the assistance of effective trial counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hayward v. Godinez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.