Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

415 F.2d 480

Docket No. 27659.

Smith v. Leach

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1969-09-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1969

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Smith v. Leach

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1969-09-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1

See also, D.C., 294 F.Supp. 862.

¶2

Howard Moore, Jr., Peter E. Rindskopf, Charles Morgan, Jr., Reber F. Boult, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.

¶3

Allen L. Chancey, Jr., U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen. of Georgia, Atlanta, Ga., Robert V. Zener, Patricia S. Baptiste, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellees.

ON SUGGESTION FOR HEARING EN BANC

ORDER:

¶4

No Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on hearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Hearing En Banc is denied.

/415/f2d/480 · .json · Public domain