Newhouse v. Misterly’s Empirical Analysis
415 F.2d 514 · 1969
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2019 · most notably South Dakota v. Neville (1983), Leavitt v. Arave (2004)
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · United States v. Wade · Schmerber v. State of California · Griffin v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where an underlying right to refuse such a blood test is present, it would be improper to draw adverse inferences from failure of the accused to respond to a request for a blood test because the accused would thereby be penalized for exercising his rights to refuse the test.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is best described as conduct indicating a consciousness of guilt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.