Wade v. Yeager’s Empirical Analysis
415 F.2d 570 · 1969
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 1983
14 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bruton v. United States · Pointer v. Texas · Douglas v. Alabama · Delli Paoli v. United States · Roberts v. Russell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“John’s choice not to cross-examine Nathaniel regarding the confession does not destroy the reality that Nathaniel was available for that purpose. The right of confrontation is satisfied where there is the opportunity for cross-examination and does not require that the opportunity be exercised.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“instead of being wrung from him on cross-examination shows only that cross-examination was unnecessary and not that it was unavailable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.