Pulaski v. Finch’s Empirical Analysis
415 F.2d 613 · 1969
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 2016
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Flake v. Gardner · Carroll v. Frontera Compania Naviera, S. A. · Williamson v. Gardner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it is clear from the record before us that it apparently escaped the attention of the Trial Examiner, the Appeals Council, and the District Court, that the VA had classified [the claimant] as ‘permanently and totally’ disabled as a result of various physical ailments. Since this critically relevant and material evidence was overlooked below, we must vacate the judgment of the District Court and order that the case once again be remanded to the Secretary. 8”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“permanently and totally disabled from non-service connected disability”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Durden v. Colvin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.