Winston v. Prudential Lines, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
415 F.2d 619 · 1969
Citation profile
21 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2017
21 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Edward Davis v. United Fruit Company, Defendant-Respondent · R. E. Peckham, Assignee and Trustee, Etc. v. Family Loan Company · Vitarelle v. Long Island Rail Road
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[A] court must not let its zeal for a tidy calendar overcome its duty to do justice.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“assuring that justice for all litigants be neither delayed nor impaired.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.