Lane-Coos-Curry-Douglas Counties Building & Construction Trades Council v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis
415 F.2d 656 · 1969
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 1990 · most notably National Labor Relations Board v. Tahoe Nugget, Inc. (1978), Danielson v. Joint Board of Coat, Suit & Allied Garment Workers' Union (1974)
21 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board · Orange Belt District Council of Painters No. 48 v. National Labor Relations Board · Essex County Council of Carpenters v. National Labor Relations Board · Dallas Building & Construction Trades Council v. National Labor Relations Board · Construction, Production & Maintenance Laborers Union, Local 383, AFI-CIO v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[W]hile the legislation was initially motivated by blackmail picketing and inter-union warfare, the proscriptions of Section 8(b) (7) are not confined to that context. Congress in terms outlawed any picketing which sought to compel the employer to recognize and deal with a nonrepresentative labor organization on the subjects which could substantially affect the working conditions of the employees. And the agreement proposed by the Council would have a significant impact upon some of the general contractors' employees. The Supreme Court has recognized that subcontracting is a mandatory bargaining subject; and the Board has found in this case that the adoption of the proposed agreement might vitally affect the number of employees hired by the general contractors. This is so because there are some types of work, laboring and mill-wrights' work, for example, which the general contractors sometimes subcontract and sometimes perform with their own employees. Without a union signatory agreement as proposed by the Council, the general contractors are likely to send out such work to relatively cheaper, non-unionized subcontractors rather than to perform it with their own higher-cost union employees." (footnote omitted).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.