United States v. Scully’s Empirical Analysis
415 F.2d 680 · 1969
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently December 2009 · most notably 68 Ill. 2d 158 - People v. Wipfler (1977), 3 Cal. 3d 734 - Jones v. Superior Court (1970)
14 federal appellate · 1 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Simmons v. United States · Stovall v. Denno · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · United States v. Ewell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘ * * * [AJppellant has not sustained his burden and has not shown that “the delay has so impaired his capacity to prepare a defense as to amount to an infringement of his right to a speedy trial or a denial of due process.” United States v. Capaldo, 402 F.2d 821, 823 (2 Cir. 1968). A delayed arrest does not in and of itself deny any constitutional rights. The Statute of Limitations is a citizen’s primary guarantee protecting him from having to answer overly stale criminal charges. United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116, 122 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 (1966). If one is arrested within the time limits imposed by the applicable Statute of Limitations it is incumbent upon him to show that he suffered some significant prejudice as a result of any delay in the making of the arrest. * * *’ [Emphasis supplied.]” 459 S.W.2d at 345 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Odzark
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.