Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

415 F.2d 874

Docket No. 27550

Williams v. Kimbrough

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Sept. 5, 1969.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1969-09-05

2 counsel of record

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“no compelling circumstances to justify overturning the trial court's discretion in refusing to award attorneys' fees”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Lee v. Southern Home Sites Corp.

Relies on Murphy v. Houma Well Service · Local Union No. 12 v. National Labor Relations Board · United States v. Jefferson County Board of Education

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1969-09-05

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1985 · most notably Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond (1974), Lee v. Southern Home Sites Corp. (1970)

33 federal appellate ·

420196919701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Summary Calendar.

¶2See also, D.C., 295 F.Supp. 578.

¶3William Bennett Turner, Jack Greenberg, Norman C. Amaker, New York City, A. P. Tureaud, New Orleans, La., Murphy W. Bell, Baton Rouge, La., for appellant.

¶4Thompson L. Clarke, Dist. Atty., St. Joseph, La., Jack P. F. Gremillion, Atty. Gen., State of Louisiana, Baton Rouge, La., for appellee.

¶5Before WISDOM, COLEMAN and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

¶6*875PER CURIAM:

¶7Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the Clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I.

¶8The district court held that four Negro teachers employed by the Madison Parish school system had been dismissed in violation of the holding in United States v. Jefferson County Board of Education, 372 F.2d 836, aff’d with modifications on rehearing en banc, 380 F.2d 385, cert. denied sub nom, Caddo Parish School Bd. v. United States, 389 U.S. 840, 88 S.Ct. 67, 19 L.Ed.2d 103 (1967). In so holding, the district court denied the school teachers’ motion for attorneys’ fees. That denial is the sole question raised on appeal.

¶9Attorneys’ fees are historically beyond the scope of taxable costs. Globemaster, Inc. v. Magic Am. Corp., 6 Cir. 1967, 386 F.2d 420. Their award necessarily requires a permitting statute,1 a contractual obligation, or an equitable discretion in the trial court. Brisacher v. Tracy Collins Trust Company, 10 Cir. 1960, 277 F.2d 519.

¶10The trial court found that the teachers’ dismissals were not “unreasonable and obdurately obstinate” and accordingly did not tax attorneys’ fees against the school board. See Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond, Virginia, 4 Cir. 1965, 345 F.2d 310. We find no compelling circumstances to justify overturning the trial court’s discretion in refusing to award attorneys’ fees. We affirm. See Kemp v. Beasley, 8 Cir. 1965, 352 F.2d 14; Harrington v. Texaco, 5 Cir. 1964, 339 F.2d 814.

¶11Affirmed.

/415/f2d/874 · .json · Public domain