DiPiazza v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
415 F.2d 99 · 1969
Citation profile
50 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2019 · most notably 106 Wash. 2d 54 - State v. Gunwall (1986), State v. Hunt (1982)
50 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Aguilar v. Texas · Brinegar v. United States · Spinelli v. United States · Draper v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where the investigation may produce both civil and criminal evidence, the summons under section 7602 is a proper device for obtaining records. See United States v. Powell [supra], 379 U.S. 48 , 85 S.Ct. 248 , 13 L.Ed.2d 112 ; Ryan v. United States, 379 U.S. 61 , 85 S.Ct. 232 , 13 L.Ed.2d 122 , aff’g 320 F.2d 500 (6th Cir.). The burden is on the party objecting to the summons to show that it was used for an unlawful purpose. See United States v. Powell, supra at 58 , 85 S.Ct. 248 ; United States v. Nunnally, 278 F.Supp. 843 (D.C.Tenn.) DiPiazza v. United States, C.A.6th (1969), 415 F.2d 99, 103 [2],”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“" Spinelli is no authority for the proposition that the search warrant is invalid because an investigation is begun as a result of a tip. Weak, anonymous and even untrustworthy information may serve as the opening clue to uncovering criminal acts... ." DiPiazza v. United States, 415 F.2d 99, 105 (6th Cir.1969).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“For the purpose of ascertaining the correctness of any return . . . determining the liability of any person for any internal revenue tax . . . the Secretary or his delegate is authorized-(1) To examine any books, papers, records, or other data which may be relevant or material to such inquiry . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.