Ranchers Cattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stockgrowers of America v. United States Department of Agriculture’s Empirical Analysis
415 F.3d 1078 · 2005
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 15 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc · Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission · Bennett v. Spear · Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources Council
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`(1) a ong likelihood of success on the merits, (2) the possibility of irreparable injury to the plaintiff if preliminary relief is not granted, (3) a balance of hardships favoring the plaintiff, and (4) advancement of the public interest (in certain cases).'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the statute's use of the word `may' suggests that [USDA] is given discretion over such decisions as whether to close the borders.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“does not require the Secretary to quantify a permissible level of risk or to conduct a risk assessment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.