Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 415 F.3d 44 - Pro-Football, Inc. v. Harjo

Pro-Football, Inc. v. Harjo’s Empirical Analysis

415 F.3d 44 · 2005

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 19 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan · Holmberg v. Armbrecht · Gull Airborne Instruments, Inc. v. Weinberger · Hoyt v. Sprague · Peter Wagner v. John Baird

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he words '[a]t any time' demonstrate only that the act imposes no statute of limitations”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “requires proof of (1) lack of diligence by the party against whom the defense is asserted, and (2) prejudice to the party asserting the defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Laches is founded on the notion that equity aids the vigilant and not those who slumber on their rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.