Christopher Holly v. D. Woolfolk’s Empirical Analysis
415 F.3d 678 · 2005
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
February 2015
most recently cited
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Bell v. Wolfish · Sandin v. Conner · Gerstein v. Pugh · Hewitt v. Helms
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“being placed in segregation is too trivial an incremental deprivation of a convicted prisoner's liberty to trigger the duty of due process”) (2 days); Lekas v. Briley, 405 F.3d 602 , 612 (7th Cir.2005) (analyzing conditions of confinement, but also noting that prisoner's segregation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.