Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 415 F.3d 728 - United States v. Johnson

United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

415 F.3d 728 · 2005

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably United States v. Baker (2008), United States v. Brodie (2007)

19 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

250200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Booker · United States v. Olano · Edwards v. Arizona · Rhode Island v. Innis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We think ... that in context the word “waiver” in Rule 12(e) does not carry the strict implication of an “intentional relinquishment of a known right” that precludes all appellate review.... [A] true waiver occurs only through an intentional relinquishment of an argument, while a forfeiture is the result of a neglectful failure to present an argument.... It is also worth noting that Rule 12(e) itself says that “[f]or good cause, the court may grant relief from the waiver.” This too makes it sound more like what we would normally call forfeiture.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`is more akin to a forfeiture than a waiver'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.