415 F. Supp. 550 - Abrams v. Hills’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
October 1987
most recently cited
5 district ·
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1715Z · 12 U.S.C. § 1715Z · 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Relies on 396 F. Supp. 278 - Ross v. Community Services, Inc. · Dubose v. Hills
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“All persons who now reside, or have in the past resided, in housing projects in Connecticut federally subsidized pursuant to Section 236 who between February 1, 1975 and September 30, 1977 were paying more than 30% of their “adjusted family income” for rent (25% in those projects in which direct tenant payment of one or more utility charges, except telephone, was approved by HUD), and who were paying during that period for increased property taxes and utilities above the initial operating expense level established for their project which should have been paid for by HUD through tax and utility cost subsidies pursuant to Section 212 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, 12 U.S.C. § 1715z-l(f)(3) and (g).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dubose v. Harris
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.