← 415 F. Supp. 70 - Shell Oil Co. v. Train

415 F. Supp. 70 - Shell Oil Co. v. Train’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

cited by 10 later decisions

November 1978

most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 33 U.S.C. § 1251 (Alternative Water Sources Act of 2000) · 33 U.S.C. § 1311 · 33 U.S.C. § 1314 · 33 U.S.C. § 1316 · 33 U.S.C. § 1342 · 33 U.S.C. § 1362 · 33 U.S.C. § 1369 · 5 U.S.C. § 701

Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Power Reactor Development Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers · American Meat Institute v. Environmental Protection Agency · CPC International Inc. v. Train

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[T]he petition for review is dismissed . on the ground that the . . . decision by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board was not an act by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency such as would give this Court jurisdiction under Section 509(b)(1) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
e.g. Mianus River Preservation Committee v. Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency · Shell Oil Co. v. Train
“state requested and received advice from the regional office of the federal (EPA).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
e.g. Shell Oil Co. v. Train · Shell Oil Co. v. Train
“(2) No permit shall issue 11 "(B) if the Administrator within ninety days of the date of transmittal of the proposed permit by the State objects in writing to the issuance of such permit as being outside the guidelines and requirements of this Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
e.g. State of Washington, and Its Department of Ecology v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Russell E. Train, Administrator, and Clifford v. Smith, Jr., Regional Administrator, Region X, Scott Paper Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Russell E. Train, Administrator, and Clifford v. Smith, Jr., Regional Administrator, Region X, Scott Paper Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Russell E. Train, Administrator, and Clifford v. Smith, Jr., Regional Administrator, Region X, Defendants

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.