415 F. Supp. 2d 1323 - Morris v. Khadr’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2331 (Material Support to Terrorism Prohibition Enhancement Act of 2004) · 18 U.S.C. § 2333 (Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act of 2019) · 18 U.S.C. § 2336 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“survived the attack ... has no 'survivors' or 'heirs' that can recover for his injuries on his behalf.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.