Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 415 F. Supp. 2d 225 - Hibbert v. Poole

415 F. Supp. 2d 225 - Hibbert v. Poole’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · North Carolina v. Alford · Hill v. Lockhart · Brady v. United States · McMann v. Richardson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a criminal defendant has solemnly admitted in open court that he is in fact guilty of the offense with which he is charged, he may not thereafter raise independent claims relating to the deprivation of constitutional rights that occurred prior to the entry of the guilty plea. He may only attack the voluntary and intelligent character of the guilty plea ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 372 F. Supp. 3d 7 - United States v. Marandola
  2. “[BJecause Davis' lawyer did not unreasonably forego filing a suppression motion on behalf of his client, we cannot say Davis has shown 'a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Moore v. Czerniak
  3. “In other words, under Tollett , the only issues reviewable by a federal habeas court relate to whether the guilty plea ... represent[ed] a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative courses of action open to the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 372 F. Supp. 3d 7 - United States v. Marandola

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.