Moore v. Moriarty’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 177 Ind. App. 403 - Kroger Co. v. Haun · 170 Ind. App. 373 - Kruse, Kruse & Miklosko, Inc. v. Beedy · Hunsberger v. Wyman · Arnold v. Dirrim · 166 Ind. App. 106 - Lovely v. Keele
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It requires much more than the general awareness of a potential for mishap. Incurred risk contemplates acceptance of a specific risk 3 of which the plaintiff has actual knowledge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Power v. Brodie“definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burnett v. Heckelman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.