Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 415 NE2D 783 - Evans v. Huss

Evans v. Huss’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 34 Wis. 2d 559 - State Ex Rel. Dudek v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County · 32 F. Supp. 21 - Lewis v. United Air Lines Transport Corporation · 36 F. Supp. 593 - Boynton v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. · 175 Ind. App. 257 - Costanzi v. Ryan · Walsh v. Reynolds Metals Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under subdivision (b)(4)(C), the court is directed or authorized to issue protective orders, including an order that the expert be paid a reasonable fee for time spent in responding to discovery, and that the party whose expert is made subject to discovery be paid a fair portion of the fees and expenses that the party incurred in obtaining information from the expert. The court may issue the latter order as a condition of discovery, or it may delay the order until after discovery is completed. These provisions for fees and expenses meet the objection that it is unfair to permit one side to obtain without cost the benefit of an expert’s work for which the other side has paid, often a substantial sum.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.