415 N.J. Super. 597 - Walker v. Giuffre’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1601 (§ 102 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. Winn · Rendine v. Pantzer · Furst v. Einstein Moomjy, Inc. · Furst v. Einstein Moomjy, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“i.e. a reasonable hourly charge multiplied by the number of hours expended. Rendine v. Pantzer, 141 N.J. 292, 334-35 , 661 A. 2d 1202 (1995). In determining the lodestar, the court should compare the hourly rate of the attorney to the rates charged for similar services of attorneys in the community with”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“I have handled a significant number of class actions and ruled on a number of fee requests. The fees requested in this case are generally consistent with what I have seen and awarded in the past. In my opinion, they are reasonable. [Id. at 607, 2 A.3d 1165 .]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Walker v. Giuffre“Id. at 337 , 661 A. 2d 1202 (internal citations omitted). The court must determine reasonable hourly billing rates that are”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.