State v. Mayberry’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently November 2018
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kelly v. Robinson · United States v. Brown · Schmitt v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc. · United States v. Florence · State v. Haines
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires: 1. “Victim ” means a person who has suffered pecuniary damages as a result of the offender’s criminal activities. However, for purposes of this chapter, an insurer is not a victim and does not have a right of subrogation.... 2. “Pecuniary damages” means all damages to the extent not paid by an insurer, which a victim could recover against the offender in a civil action arising out of the same facts or event, ... [[Image here]] 4. “Restitution” means payment of pecuniary damages to a victim in an amount and in the manner provided by the offender’s plan of restitution. Restitution also includes the payment of crime victim assistance reimbursements, court costs, court-appointed attorney’s fees or the expense of a public defender, and the performance of public service by an offender in an amount set by the court when the offender cannot reasonably pay all or part of the court costs, court-appointed attorney’s fees or the expense of a public defender.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Wagner · State v. Watts“910.2 Restitution or community service to be ordered by sentencing court. In all criminal cases except simple misdemeanors under chapter 321, in which there is a plea of guilty, or special verdict upon which a judgment of conviction is rendered, the sentencing court shall order that restitution be made by each offender to the victims of the offender’s criminal activities and, if the court so orders and to the extent that the offender is reasonably able to do so, for crime victim assistance reimbursement, court costs, court-appointed attorney’s fees or the expense of a public defender when applicable. However, victims shall be paid in full before restitution is paid for crime victim assistance reimbursement, court costs, court-appointed attorney’s fees or for the expense of a public defender. In structuring a plan of restitution, the court shall provide for payments in the following order of priority: victim, crime victim assistance reimbursement, court costs, and court-appointed attorney’s fees or the expense of a public defender. (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Wagner“910.3 Determination of amount of restitution. The court shall require the county attorney to promptly prepare a statement of pecuniary damages to victims of the defendant and shall require the clerk of court to prepare a statement of court-appointed attorney’s fees, the expense of a public defender and court costs which shall be promptly provided to the presen-tence investigator. These statements shall become a part of the presentence report. If a defendant believes no person suffered pecuniary damages, the defendant shall so state. If the defendant has any mental or physical impairment which would limit or prohibit the performance of a public service, the defendant shall so state....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Wagner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.