Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 415 P3D 348 - Nielson v. Talbot

Nielson v. Talbot’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Intermountain Forest Management, Inc. v. LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORP. · P.O. Ventures, Inc. v. Loucks Family Irrevocable Trust · Thomas v. Madsen · Paurley v. Harris · Boise Tower Associates, LLC v. Hogland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The party asserting the abuse of discretion carries the burden of demonstrating that an abuse of discretion occurred, and a failure to do so is fatal to its argument.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “whether the trial court: (1) correctly perceived the issue as one of discretion; (2) acted within the outer boundaries of its discretion; (3) acted consistently with the legal standards applicable to the specific choices available to it; and (4) reached its decision by the exercise of reason.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Failing to demonstrate that an abuse of discretion occurred under any part of the test applied by this Court.... is fatal to [an] argument that the court abused its discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.