State v. Williander.’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2023
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Washington v. Texas · United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal · 9 Haw. App. 600 - State v. Lee · State v. Yutaka Mitake · State v. Crisostomo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether counsel exercised due diligence in seeking to obtain the attendance of the witness; and (2) whether the witness provides relevant and material testimony that benefits the defendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the relevant factors to consider in evaluating whether a motion for continuance should be granted are: (1) whether counsel exercised due diligence in seeking to obtain the attendance of the witness; and (2) whether the witness provides relevant and material testimony that benefits the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A motion for continuance is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and the court's ruling will not be disturbed on appeal absent a showing of abuse of that discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Michels
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.