Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

415 S.C. 274

In re Herlong

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 27, 2016

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 2016-01-27

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2016

1 state decisions

Relies on In re Herlong

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2016-01-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC), with respondent’s consent, petitions this Court to transfer respondent to incapac*275ity inactive status pursuant to Rule 28(f) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR). In addition, ODC requests the Court lift respondent’s interim suspension since the criminal charges against him have been resolved. See In the Matter of Herlong, 413 S.C. 232, 776 S.E.2d 86 (2015).

¶3IT IS ORDERED that respondent is transferred to incapacity inactive status until further order of this Court.

¶4Since the criminal charges against respondent have been resolved, the Court lifts respondent’s interim suspension.

s/Costa M. Pleicones, C.J.
/415/sc/274 · .json · Public domain