Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 415 So. 2d 1131 - Pate v. State

415 So. 2d 1131 - Pate v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 1998
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Young v. State · 50 Ala. App. 49 - Cooks v. State · 344 So. 2d 1264 - Slinker v. State · Rose v. Magro · 369 So. 2d 873 - Leonard v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]hese statements were not used by the victims to refresh their recollections while they were on the witness stand,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he trial court correctly ruled that defense counsel was not entitled to inspect and use the statements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.