Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 415 SO2D 1158 - Buffo v. State

Buffo v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
5
states following
October 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2010

2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

901982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores · Santoni v. United States · Superintendent of Insurance of State of New York v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company · Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc. · Federal Communications Commission v. Home Box Office, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “since there are few Alabama cases construing the Alabama securities laws, federal cases should be reviewed to aid in the proper interpretation of the corresponding sections of Alabama statutory law inasmuch as the sections are virtually identical.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(2) Make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading; or”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Section 8-6-17 was intended to prohibit all fraudulent schemes in connection with the offer, sale, or purchase of securities. This is true whether or not 'the artifices employed involve a garden-type variety of fraud, or present a unique form of deception.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.