415 So. 2d 1233 - Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2010
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Stovall v. Denno · 369 So. 2d 1251 - Cook v. State · Watson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that a person [who] is actually told the suspect's photograph is among the pictures, although generally inadvisable, does not contaminate the identification proceeding.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Williams v. State , 348 So.2d 1101 , 1104 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, Ex parte Williams , 348 So.2d 1105 (Ala. 1977). See also Jones v. State , 415 So.2d 1233 , 1236 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982). Cf. United States v. Gambrill , 449 F.2d 1148 , 1158 (D.C. Cir. 1971) (Witness's”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The question of whether the victim's identification was positive or not goes to the weight and credibility of her testimony, and was a question for the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.