Xerox Corp. v. Blake’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “1. The Court finds that the Plaintiff failed to sustain its burden of proof that the Property Appraiser did not consider all the relevant factors under F.S. 193.011. 2. The Court rejects the income approach used by Plaintiff's experts as representing just or market value for the following reasons: (a) The approach failed to provide for salvage value. (b) The officer or agent of the Plaintiff admitted that the Plaintiff corporation would not sell its equipment at the prices indicated by its income approach. 3. The "List Price less depreciation" method used by the Property Appraiser more accurately reflected just value albeit that the amount of sales was small and the sales were not of all models of Xerox equipment. 4. The Property Appraiser did not abuse his discretion, and the value set by the Property Appraiser did represent just or fair market value.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 447 So. 2d 1348 - Blake v. Xerox Corp.

2. “that the absence of an established sales market for the Xerox equipment in question required the appraiser to utilize an income capitalization method as the only method which would assure a just valuation.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 447 So. 2d 1348 - Blake v. Xerox Corp.