Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 415 U.S. 566 - Smith v. Goguen

Smith v. Goguen’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

2,981
cited by 2,981 later decisions
71
cited 71 times by the Supreme Court
46
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

613 federal appellate · 267 district · 1,173 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,981 later decisions (71 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2025 · most notably Buckley v. Valeo (1976), Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. (1982)

613 federal appellate · 267 district · 1,173 state decisions — followed in 46 states

8260197419801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedGoguen v. Smith (from First Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Grayned v. City of Rockford · United States v. O'Brien · Connally v. General Construction Co. · Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District · Picard v. Connor

Cited together with Kolender v. Lawson · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Connally v. General Construction Co. · Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,981 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is not actual notice, but the other principal element of the doctrine—the requirement that a legislature establish minimal guidelines to govern law enforcement.”
    39 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a standardless sweep [that] allows policemen, prosecutors, and juries to pursue their personal predilections.”
    38 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A] statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application, violates the first essential of due process of law.”
    28 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.