Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 415 U.S. 936 - Wright v. North Carolina Et Al.

Wright v. North Carolina Et Al.’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

141
cited by 141 later decisions
5
cited 5 times by the Supreme Court
19
states following
August 1996
most recently cited

63 federal appellate · 10 district · 47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 141 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1996 · most notably Hutto v. Davis (1982), Duckworth v. Eagan (1989)

63 federal appellate · 10 district · 47 state decisions — followed in 19 states

950197419801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Richardson v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc. · Ruffalo v. Mahoning County Bar Ass'n · Detenber v. American Universal Insurance Co · Thompson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 141 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Before we ask you any questions, you must understand your rights. You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can be used against you in court. You have the right to talk to a lawyer for advice before we ask you any questions, and to have him with you during questioning. You have this right to the advice and presence of a lawyer even if you cannot afford to hire one. We have no way of giving you a lawyer, but one will be appointed for you, if you wish, if and when you go to court. If you wish to answer questions now without a lawyer present, you have the right to stop answering questions at any time. You also have the right to stop answering at any time until you talk to a lawyer.” “WAIVER: I have read the statement of my rights shown above. I understand what my rights are. I am willing to answer questions and make a statement. I do not want a lawyer. I understand and know what I am doing. No promises or threats have been made to me and no pressure of any kind has been used against me.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.