Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 416 A2D 684 - State v. Read

State v. Read’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2015

6 state decisions

201980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Brinegar v. United States · Spinelli v. United States · Jones v. United States · United States v. Ventresca

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “one in the position of an arrestee would not be likely to exacerbate his circumstances by telling the arresting officers an untruthful account of his source of supply.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.