Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 416 BR 264 - Smith v. Porter

Smith v. Porter’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
January 2016
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 547 · 11 U.S.C. § 548 · 28 U.S.C. § 158

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Foman v. Davis · Laber v. Harvey

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.