Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 416 F.2d 1155 - Olais-Castro v. United States

Olais-Castro v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

416 F.2d 1155 · 1969

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
5
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

45 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently August 2010 · most notably State v. Brown (1972), United States v. Johnson (1980)

45 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

310196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 545 · 19 U.S.C. § 1401 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1461 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 26 U.S.C. § 7237

Relies on Sansone v. United States · Stevenson v. United States · United States v. Sischo · Babb v. United States · Kelly v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “necessarily included in the offense charged”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “As observed in 8 Moore’s Federal Practice (2d ed.), 31.03: “The former denotes a relationship which always exists between two offense categories, such as larceny and robbery, regardless of the facts of a particular case. The latter depends upon particular facts.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Stated differently, the (lesser) offense must not require some additional element not needed to constitute the greater offense.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.