Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 416 F.2d 263 - United States v. Beverley

United States v. Beverley’s Empirical Analysis

416 F.2d 263 · 1969

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
November 1979
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 2114

Relies on Gregg v. United States · Wagner v. United States · United States v. Donovan · Slayden v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whoever assaults any person having lawful charge, control, or custody of any mail matter or of any money or other property of the United States, with intent to rob, steal, or purloin such mail matter, money or other property of the United States, or robs any such person of mail matter, or of any money, or other property of the United States, shall, for the first offense, be imprisoned not more than ten years; and if in effecting or attempting to effect such robbery he wounds the person having custody of such mail, money, or other property of the United States, or puts his life in jeopardy by the Use of a dangerous weapon, or for a subsequent offense, shall be imprisoned twenty-five years.” (Emphasis added.) 18 U.S.C. § 2114 (1970).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““[a] dangerous weapon or device” includes anything capable of being readily operated, manipulated, wielded, or otherwise used by one or more persons to inflict severe bodily harm or injury upon another personf,]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.