Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 416 F.2d 410 - Bethview Amusement Corp. v. Cahn

Bethview Amusement Corp. v. Cahn’s Empirical Analysis

416 F.2d 410 · 1969

Citation profile

91
cited by 91 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
15
states following
November 1984
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 3 district · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 91 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1984 · most notably Heller v. New York (1973), United States v. Edward A. Wild, Jr. And Louis Corrado (1970)

25 federal appellate · 3 district · 31 state decisions — followed in 15 states

860196919701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson · Marcus v. Search Warrant of Property · A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas · Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. City of Dallas · Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Finally it is suggested that unless the police or other local authorities have actual possession of the film pending the required adversary proceeding, the distributor may take advantage of the delay, for example, by shipping the film out of the jurisdiction or by cutting out the offending scenes. If there is a real threat of such activity it can be controlled by an ex parte restraining order.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if seizure of books precedes an adversary determination of their obscenity, there is danger of abridgement of the right of the public in a free society to unobstructed circulation of non-obscene books.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the procedure leading to the seizure order was constitutionally deficient.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.