Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 416 F.2d 412 - Shultz v. Salinas

Shultz v. Salinas’s Empirical Analysis

416 F.2d 412 · 1969

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
December 1975
most recently cited

10 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956)

Relies on Murphy v. Houma Well Service · Gulf King Shrimp Company v. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor · Goldberg v. Cockrell · Mitchell v. Hausman · Lenroot v. Interstate Bakeries Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Two factors to be considered in determining whether an injunction should issue are the employer's previous actions of noncompliance and the dependability of its promises for future compliance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.