United States v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
416 F.2d 63 · 1969
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2007
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 287
Relies on Russell v. United States · Hartman v. United States · Williams v. United States · Carney v. United States · Masi v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rule 7(c) [ ] permit[s] the citation of a statute on an indictment to be amended where ... the facts alleged in the indictment will support such a change.”) 2 . The target of a threat (or to whom it was directed) is often referred to as the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The statutory citation is not, however, regarded as part of the indictment.... We read Rule 7(c) to permit the citation of a statute on an indictment to be amended where, as here, the facts alleged will support such a change.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.