Craig v. Finch’s Empirical Analysis
416 F.2d 721 · 1969
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
November 1976
most recently cited
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Murphy v. Houma Well Service · Sangster v. Gardner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Section 205(c) (5) (G) relates only to situations in which earnings were reported but allocated to the wrong person or period. In this case all wages reported to the Secretary had been properly allocated. * * * In short, Section 205(c) (5) (G) deals with errors in the Secretary's records to the incorrect allocation of wages to wrong individuals or periods. It does not allow changes to be 'made at any time' in the Secretary's reports when the changes sought are based upon missing information never previously reported.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[It exists] [t]o correct errors resulting from the employer's reporting of wages for an incorrect period, or from his reporting wages for one individual under the name and account number of another.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(G) [Corrections are to be made] to correct errors made in the allocation, to individuals or periods, of wages or self-employment income entered in the records of the Secretary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.