Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 416 F.3d 1313 - United States v. White

United States v. White’s Empirical Analysis

416 F.3d 1313 · 2005

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
April 2015
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · United States v. Cotton · United States v. Rodriguez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant; (2) the need for the sentence imposed (A) to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment for the offense; (B) to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct; (C) to protect the public from further crimes of the defendant; and (D) to provide the defendant with needed [treat ment]; ... (4) the kinds of sentence and the sentencing range established for ... (B), in the case of a violation of ... supervised release, the applicable guidelines or policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission ...; and (5) any pertinent policy statement issued by the Sentencing Commission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]n error cannot meet the ‘plain’ requirement of the plain error rule if it is not ‘clear under current law.’ ”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.